Home archaeology Bullet Indicates Lawrence of Arabia Was No liar

Bullet Indicates Lawrence of Arabia Was No liar

A bullet fired by Lawrence of Arabia during one of his most famous acts of guerrilla warfare has been discovered in the Arabian desert by a team of archaeologists, led by the University of Bristol, confirming the accuracy of Lawrence’s own account of the attack in his war memoir, Seven Pillars of Wisdom.

The spent bullet was found at the site of the 1917 Hallat Ammar train ambush — immortalised in a scene in David Lean’s Oscar-winning biopic Lawrence of Arabia — during fieldwork by Bristol’s Professor Nicholas Saunders and Dr. Neil Faulkner, and colleagues, as part of the Great Arab Revolt Project (GARP).

The project has excavated dozens of sites across the Arabian desert associated with the 1916-1918 revolt by Arab forces against the Ottoman Turks, then allied to Germany. T.E. Lawrence — later known as Lawrence of Arabia — served as a liaison officer with the rebel forces, an experience he described in Seven Pillars of Wisdom.

Professor Nicholas Saunders said:

While several of Lawrence’s biographers have accused him of embellishing his stories, nothing the archaeologists found at any of the sites they excavated supports this view.

The bullet fired by Lawrence at Hallat Ammar and discovered by archaeologists from the Great Arab Revolt Project. (Image: Ali Baldry)

Dr. Neil Faulkner said:

In an unlikely coincidence, just two months ago, another Hallat Ammar connection appeared when a Hejaz Railway engine nameplate came to light after being “lost” for almost 80 years. Lawrence had given it to the family of his friend, Vyvyan Richards, for safekeeping in 1933 but never retrieved it before his death in 1935. The inscription is in Ottoman Turkish written in Arabic script and translates as “iron road,” that is “Hejaz Railway.”

The family tradition records that it was “souvenired” by Lawrence from one of the trains he attacked. Many of these raids were on bridges and tracks rather than on locomotives, and, when they were, there was little time to safely hang around and take souvenirs.

The locomotive nameplate ‘souvenired’ by Lawrence from one of the trains he attacked. (Image: Nicholas Saunders)
The locomotive nameplate ‘souvenired’ by Lawrence from one of the trains he attacked. (Image: Nicholas Saunders)

The best documented example of such an opportunity is the ambush at Hallat Ammar, where the Turkish train had two locomotives not one, and there was ample time to lever off a nameplate. The ambush was so spectacularly successful that it probably meant more to Lawrence than his other railway attacks, and so could have merited this  souvenir.

Provided by: University of Bristol

LIKE us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

VISION TIMEShttps://www.visiontimes.com
Vision Times is a kaleidoscopic view into the most interesting stories on the web. We also have a special talent for China stories — read About Us to find out why. Vision Times. Fascinating stuff.

Most Popular

General George Washington and the Cruel Winter at Valley Forge (Part 1)

The winter in the Valley Forge woods was the darkest hour during the War of Independence fought between the British and the original 13...

How This Chinese Skincare Tool Became Popular in America

A jade roller is a skincare product that has become popular in the Western world over the past few years. The beauty tool actually...

Constitutional Possibilities for a Second Trump Term: Dershowitz

Amid continuing suspicion of fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election, the Trump campaign has taken its objections to the projected results to the...

A New Theory: Water May Naturally Occur on All Rocky Planets

Life is deeply dependent on water, but where does water come from? Based on new research, researchers believe it may emerge in connection with...