Home World Events Peace and Conflict Is Russia Really Withdrawing?

Is Russia Really Withdrawing?

Monday’s announcement of the Russian withdrawal from Syria was surprising to western analysts and media. Unused to a quick insertion and withdrawal from peacekeeping missions, many had believed that Russia had engaged itself in the quagmire of Middle Eastern politics for the discernible future.

Putin certainly appeared sincere in his intention to withdraw in the Kremlin’s televised cabinet meeting with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, stating that:

Russian President Vladimir Putin, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, and Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu meeting to discuss the withdrawal from Syria. (Image: Kremlim.ru)

Soon reports began to circulate that Washington and Moscow had come to a secret deal over the Ukraine, or that recent economic sanctions would soon be lifted.

War, or something like it

The reality is somewhat less surprising; Putin, ever the politician, was engaging in some good old-fashioned doublespeak. In the meeting it can be noted that Putin remarks that he wants the Russian run maritime base in Tartus and Hmeymim Airbase to continue to function and be protected from land, sea, and air, arguing that:

So, in reality the withdrawal is merely a drawdown of certain military platforms like the Su-25 strike aircraft and Su-34 bombers that were inserted into Syria after October 2015. Remaining will be the Su-24 bombers and Mi-24 and Mi-35 attack helicopters, as well as the Su-30SM and Su-35 multirole fighters with the deadly S-400 long range air defense missiles and the shorter range systems.

Russian S 400 missiles on display in a May Day Parade. (Image: wikipedia CC BY 2.0 )

Ground troops and naval cover forces protecting and operating these bases will remain, and any of those forces advising and helping Syrian forces will remain in an advisory capacity. In short, this announced withdrawal is merely another way for Russia to change around its equipment and personnel, while at the same time not really changing its presence or undermining its assets in the country.

Reports in the last few days that Russia has continued to provide air support during the battle for Palmyra support this hypothesis, as do the statements of Moscow’s ambassador to the UN’s Vitaly Chulkin that drones would still be in use over Syria supporting the government forces. Russia also has plans to expand the Tartus naval base and utilize Syria as combat training for its new helicopters, the Ka-52 Alligator and Mi-28N.

Russia’s New Ka-52 attack helicopter. (Image: yaplakal.com CC BY 2.0 )

Training grounds

If Russia is still maintaining its position in Syria, what else does it want? Thanks to the Kremlins transcript it is possible to see the reason for Putin’s sudden involvement in Syria last October. Putin was simply shooting two birds with one arrow. By supporting the Assad regime and defending its strategic interests, it allowed Russia to test its weapons systems and tactical operating concepts. Or, as Putin states:

Soft diplomacy

Now that Russia has met its personal goal of supporting the Assad regime to a position of control, it appears that it is prepared for the transition to soft diplomacy as the next step. Prior to Russia’s announced withdrawal, the Assad government had been playing tough at the peace negotiations. According to Joshua Landis, the Director of the Center for Middle East Studies at the University of Oklahoma, the Assad regime had expressed “a constant drumbeat of confidence that they’re going to take back every inch of Syrian soil, and Russia is their partner.”

However, President Putin does not seem to have received that memo. Instead, Vladimir Putin has clearly indicated to Bashar al Assad that he is not wearing the big boots anymore. Rather, Putin, by announcing his withdrawal, is reminding Assad of who has provided his power, in the hope that this will force the Assad regime to the negotiation table in Geneva.


While it is hoped that a peace deal can be reached, getting everyone to agree will be difficult. Currently the plan being tossed around by the Russian and Western powers is a one devised by John Kerry, U.S. Secretary of State, and the Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. According to The Economist both men discussed the possibility of partitioning of Syria into a federalist state based along clan, and sectarian divisions.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and United States President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry discuss Syrian Peace Process. (Image: Пресс-служба Президента России via Wikimedia Commons / CC BY 4.0)

In this vision the territory in the west, running roughly from Latakia in the north down to Damascus in the south, would be controlled by the Alawites of whom Bashar al Assad is a member. While the Syrian-Kurdish region in the north-east, known as Rojava, would be an autonomous Kurdish region and the rest of the country would be left to the Sunni opposition forces.

Dr. Victoria Kelly-Clark received her doctorate in political science and international relations from the Australian National University. She has lived in Central Asia and specializes in Russia and its former Soviet territories. For more information, go to Central Asia and Beyond.

LIKE us on Facebook, or follow us on Twitter.

Vision Times Staff
Vision Times is a kaleidoscopic view into the most interesting stories on the web. We also have a special talent for China stories — read About Us to find out why. Vision Times. Fascinating stuff.

Most Popular

Unconventional Warfare in Arizona: Retired US Army Colonel Describes Election Interference

Ret. Army Colonel Philip Waldron, before a select panel of Arizona legislators and the President's legal team, described U.S. election interference related to Dominion...

Michael Flynn: Communist China Backer of Coup Against the President

Michael Flynn, the retired lieutenant general recently pardoned by Donald Trump from an unproven Russia related criminal case, has warned that the President is...

Cybersecurity Expert Warns Up to 1.2 Million Invalid Votes in Pennsylvania Alone

On Nov. 25, the GOP Pennsylvania Senate Policy Committee held a public hearing to discuss irregularities and other issues surrounding the 2020 elections. Ret....

Sidney Powell Takes Aim at Georgia’s Voting Infrastructure Contracts

Lawyer Sidney Powell has called for an investigation into the Georgia voting contract that was given to Dominion Voting Systems. She has filed lawsuits...